Explore This Article

As a business owner, the way “people” feels in your business often changes long before you consciously label it as a problem.

For some small and medium businesses, it shows up early. The focus is on staying compliant, paying people correctly, and keeping the business running. Hiring decisions are practical and often made quickly, and people processes sit alongside everything else you are managing. At this stage, the challenge isn’t sophistication — it’s having the right people in place and just enough structure to reduce risk and day-to-day noise.

For some small and medium businesses, it shows up later. The business has grown, roles are more defined, and processes exist — yet alignment takes more effort than it used to. Performance feels uneven. Decisions about people, pay, and priorities carry more weight. What once worked starts to feel harder to sustain.

In both cases, the frustration is real — and it is rarely because leaders aren’t trying hard enough.

What is often happening is simpler: the business has reached a point where the way people decisions are being made no longer matches what the business now needs.

This is where many Small and Medium Businesses find themselves caught between intuition and structure — doing what has always worked, while sensing it may not be enough for what comes next.

Why This Shift Is Predictable in Small and Medium Businesses

This change isn’t random. It’s predictable.

In the early stages of a business, people decisions are often intuitive. You hire for attitude and capability, manage performance through proximity, and deal with issues as they arise. This works because the business is small enough for informal systems to hold.

As the business grows, complexity increases quietly. Roles become more specialised. Decisions have broader consequences. Informal agreements start to break down. What once relied on trust and good intent now requires clarity, consistency, and shared understanding.

At this point, people challenges are often misdiagnosed as individual issues — a performance problem, a motivation issue, or “the wrong hire”. In reality, the underlying challenge is usually structural. The business has outgrown the way people practices were designed to work.

This doesn’t mean the business has failed. It means it has evolved.

The question is no longer whether people practices exist, but whether they are fit for the stage and direction of the business.

People Maturity: A Fit-for-Purpose Approach to HR

When people talk about “better” people practices, it’s easy to assume the goal is always more structure, more systems, or more sophistication.

In reality, the right approach depends on where the business is — and where it intends to go.

This is where the idea of people maturity becomes useful.

People maturity isn’t about perfect processes or copying what larger organisations do. It’s about having the right level of structure, clarity, and discipline for your stage of business. Too little structure creates noise, inconsistency, and risk. Too much structure too early creates drag and unnecessary complexity.

A business with five employees doesn’t need the same people systems as a business with fifty. Equally, a business that intends to remain small has very different needs from one preparing to scale.

Problems arise when there is a mismatch — when people practices are under-developed for the demands of the business, or over-engineered for what the business actually requires.

Seen this way, people maturity is less about progression for its own sake, and more about fit. The real question becomes:
Are our people practices fit for the business we are running today — and the one we want tomorrow?

The SMEs People Maturity Model™ Explained

Over time, a clear pattern emerges across small and medium businesses.

While every organisation is different, the way people practices evolve often follows a similar trajectory. The challenges change, expectations shift, and leadership decisions become more complex — but the progression itself is remarkably consistent.

At CTG Human Consulting, we refer to this pattern as the SMEs People Maturity Model™.

The model is deliberately simple. It doesn’t aim to capture every nuance of people management, nor does it assume all businesses should aspire to the same end state. Instead, it provides a practical lens for understanding whether people practices are fit for the stage and intent of the business.

The model describes three broad stages most businesses move through:

• Foundational — staying compliant, paying people correctly, and keeping the business running day to day
• Operational — introducing structure, consistency, and repeatable processes to reduce noise and improve stability
• Strategic — intentionally aligning people, performance, and culture to support growth and scalability

These stages are not rankings or judgments. Each can work well — when it matches the size, complexity, and direction of the business.

Challenges tend to arise when the business has moved on, but people practices have not — or when structure is introduced without a clear business need.

Why Business Intent Changes the Right HR Approach

One of the most overlooked insights in people maturity is that intent changes everything.

Two businesses can sit at the same stage of maturity yet require very different people practices depending on where they are headed.

Consider two businesses of similar size, both with defined roles, basic policies, and some structure around performance and pay.

The first has no intention of scaling significantly. The owner values stability, flexibility, and a close-knit team. For this business, an Operational level of people maturity may be entirely fit-for-purpose — enough structure to reduce risk and confusion, without unnecessary formality.

The second plans to double in size over the next few years. For this business, the same level can quietly become a constraint. Performance expectations become harder to maintain consistently. Decision-making slows. Culture fragments as new people join.

In both cases, the issue isn’t effort or leadership capability. It’s alignment.

People maturity is not a race toward a higher level. The real risk lies in operating at a level that no longer supports the business you are building.

Where CTG Human Consulting Fits

At CTG Human Consulting, we work with businesses across all stages of people maturity — Foundational, Operational, and Strategic — not to push them toward a particular outcome, but to help them become more intentional about how people practices support their business.

For some organisations, this means strengthening foundations: reducing risk, improving compliance, clarifying roles, and bringing just enough structure to create consistency. For others, it means refining existing processes so performance, reward, and engagement are aligned and sustainable. And for businesses preparing to scale, it means ensuring people systems, leadership practices, and culture are designed to grow with the business — not rebuilt later at greater cost.

The SMEs People Maturity Model™ is the lens we use to guide these conversations. Our role is not to add complexity, but to bring clarity, alignment, and confidence to people decisions — in a way that fits the size, intent, and direction of the business.

A Final Thought for Business Owners

People challenges are rarely solved by copying what larger organisations do. They are solved by understanding what your business actually needs at its current stage — and making deliberate choices from there.

If this way of thinking resonates, a short self-reflection can be a useful starting point.

The SMEs People Maturity Model™ is a simple, 10-minute diagnostic designed to help business owners understand where their people practices sit today — and where focused attention may deliver the greatest impact.